Thursday, September 6, 2007

It's Unanimous: GOP Council Shares a Single Brain

At a recent press conference with the three Democratic County Council Candidates, David Landau pointed out the following:

"Since 2003, there have been 2,012 votes cast in council. Every single one was voted for unanimously," said Landau. "Every spending bill approved, every ordinance approved. Not once was a dissenting vote cast."

Has anyone ever heard of FIVE politicians that agreed on 2,012 votes in a row? I certainly haven't.

Since scientists haven't perfected brain-cloning, the most likely explanation is that someone else is calling the shots and that all five council members are little more than puppets doing as they are told. What is the point of having a 5 member council when 4 could leave and nothing would be any different?

Unless you've been a coma for the past 30 years, this scenario will not shock you.

In attempting to clarify why Council has voted unanimously in every vote since 2003, County Executive Director and GOP Spokeswoman, Marianne Grace, informed voters "It's not like council members are debating something that would require the partisan give-and-take found at higher and lower levels of government." Grace cited the War in Iraq and rubbish disposal contracts as two issues which were substantive enough to warrant debate.

"Amazingly Partisan" Grace seems to believe that all issues between "rubbish disposal" and the War in Iraq are not really topics for debate by GOP Council members. Well, it seems to me that this kind of thinking is the kind of rubbish we need to remove from County Council

If multiple contractors are competing for work, wouldn't you expect that at least once a member of Council might disagree with the other four? Oh, wait, I forgot. This is Delaware County where no-bid contracts are the rule, not the exception.

This lack of debate and fresh ideas is symptomatic of the stagnation in Delaware County and the aging GOP political machine that has mismanaged it.

And what of the new crop of GOP hopefuls hopeless hapless? Well, council boss Andy Reilly is running their campaigns (translation: attaching the strings for the next generation of puppets).

Ann O'Keefe, John Innelli and David Landau are diverse individuals, but unified by a real desire for truly open government:
  • end No-Bid contracts
  • disallow members or employees of pension boards to accept any gifts from money managers,
  • call for a swifter process for making county records available,
  • broadcast all council meetings on television, and
  • require the text of all proposed ordinances to be made public before the council considers them for final passage.

Instead of paying FIVE GOP Council people for ONE set of weak ideas, voters can finally get their money's worth.

This November, Voters can end this cycle of monolithic incompetence and vote for change (for a change).

3 comments:

whynotus said...

The admission by Grace is startling...Council debates matters outside the presence of the public and has meetings to rubber stamp the decisions they made in secret, without public debate or input, i.e., without sunshine. Sounds like she admitted violations of PA's Sunshine Law...are you listening Tom Corbett?

whynotus said...

The more I read Alex Rose's column and the tremendous string of unanimity, I wonder if the new group of three republicans will pledge to not conduct their business by "discussing it" during the private sessions throughout the week so the public is no longer deprived of the opportunity to see the deliberation process? It's bad enough the meetings are at 10:00 a.m. on a Tuesday and not televised for those of us who work to see how it is done. Based on Grace's comments, thought, it does not seem as though the "public" meetings are worth going to. The real ticket would be to the "discussions" during the week...I wonder if there is enough space in the room with the gang of three in there?

Pat--since your boy Andy should now be fully versed in the sunshine law after his schooling by the Grand Jury in Haverford, can you tell us (since he does not say much himself) whether he will pledge, along with his mates, to deliberate in public? It may make for longer meetings, but for $50K/year, they can all spend the time.

David Diano said...

WhyNotUs-
Fortunately, the any hollow pledges of "sunshine" by the Three Stooges are irrelevant, as John Innelli, Ann O'Keefe and David Landau will be taking those seats on Council.

The Democrats have promised to conduct the meetings at time during which more of the public can attend. They have also pledged to make public the text of proposed ordinances BEFORE votes are taken.

As for Andy's silence, my guess is that he had read the famous quote:

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.


$50K/year (plus all the perks that come with controlling a $560 million budget).

As for the current 5-member council, they could have saved $200K per year for the last 4 years since one person could have made all those unanimous votes.